tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post5973795592761424676..comments2024-01-16T05:48:33.523-05:00Comments on Errata Security: Star Trek SuckedDavid Maynorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09921229607193067441noreply@blogger.comBlogger72125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-78786708501298234632013-04-05T22:47:11.744-04:002013-04-05T22:47:11.744-04:00How on Earth did the Kardassions get involved !? A...How on Earth did the Kardassions get involved !? And just what sort of weapons do they have? Furthermore, I thought they would have been more concerned with their own reality show.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-84975683231585708682011-12-17T11:03:40.052-05:002011-12-17T11:03:40.052-05:00I would also like to say, they would never make a ...I would also like to say, they would never make a junior officer Captain of a star ship just because he did something heroic. Do you seen any navy officers suddenly in command of an aircraft carrier after only 3 or 4 years of service. UH NOOO! I don't care what he did.KHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14938416957569535536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-58455310368025877642009-12-30T10:19:55.713-05:002009-12-30T10:19:55.713-05:00Late comment I know, but here goes:
1) Product pl...Late comment I know, but here goes:<br /><br />1) Product placement. Nokia and Budweiser, shame on you. <br /><br />2) "Hip" crew. They should have called each other "homies", that would have been even "cooler". NOT.<br /><br />3) Plot. What plot? <br /><br />4) Mining ship OF DOOM !!! Ok, the romulans are a martial society, but hello? When I saw that ship, I expected some insectoid invaders to be crewing it.<br /><br />5) Red Matter. Omega 13, except that was a COMEDY. Nuff said.<br /><br />6) Spock is a moron. Why not blow up the Romulans using the red matter the first time around? No, instead, he lets himself be captured and hands them the most dangerous weapon known. Would the Spock we've know for years do that? Nope. <br /><br />7) "But there was lots of action and Uhura was HOT". Sure. There are other movies with action and hot girls. I wanted to see Start Trek, not masturbate.<br /><br />The fact that so many people liked it, along with such catastrophes as Transformers, Avatar and the god-awful ending of BSG really does not bode well for the future of the genre.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-12845059000211825432009-12-28T13:31:14.716-05:002009-12-28T13:31:14.716-05:00I don't get why so many people say the time tr...I don't get why so many people say the time travel plot sucked (besides every show getting killed and all). As long as the story is lineal and establishes the new timeline at the beggining, there's nothing "deus ex machina" about it. "Spock's logic wasn't something to look down upon, it was something to look up to." there was nothing particularly logical about Spock after all that happened. "Kirk acts like a small minded jerk." True, but that's the point of an origin story, to develop him. Kirk is the most human Enterprise captain there is, but in the end, he's willing to spare Nero for peace. True, this film wasn't as morally eventful as 'The Dark Knight', but there's nothing antagonistic about it either. I suspect a lot of these people are just mad that the film was merely good rather than making them wet their pants in joy and endow them with more philosophical enlightenment than an hour of Picard's logbook. If this aired in the sixties next to an episode where Kirk investigates a green glow that makes people talk backwards, I think it would have been accepted.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15102331455620999714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-31013081141600943142009-12-03T16:20:37.209-05:002009-12-03T16:20:37.209-05:00Star Trek XI - the "Ow! My Balls!" of St...Star Trek XI - the "Ow! My Balls!" of Star Trek.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-78528881934182276662009-12-03T03:21:30.331-05:002009-12-03T03:21:30.331-05:00What a suck ass turd of a movie! Abrahms is a douc...What a suck ass turd of a movie! Abrahms is a douche, he should direct Star Wars Movies that's all this crapfest was. Let's see both movies feature a trouble farm boy with an older mentor that knew their father before he died. The evil guy fly's around in a ship capable of destroying entire planets. Hell, they even have a Mos Eisley Cantina scene. All they needed was Figrin D'an and the Modal Nodes playing in the background. I was expecting “old” Spock to be sleeping in a Tauntaun when Captn’ Jerk just happened to find his ice cave after almost becoming “Wampa” poo. (Spoiler alert) Sulu will be using a lightsaber in the next movie. <br /><br />By the way why did Spock hide in a cave when he knew a Federation outpost was only a few miles away? While he couldn't have saved Vulcan I'm sure the Federation would have liked the back story of Vulcan's demise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-70416474090156982462009-12-01T12:50:03.461-05:002009-12-01T12:50:03.461-05:00Didn't see this movie when it came out, but ju...Didn't see this movie when it came out, but just rented the bluray the other night... I didn't like it for all the reasons i've read in these blogs... and you know, it just didn't FEEL like Star Trek... with the whole star trek universe available to draw on for ideas and stories, there was literally endless possiblities for a 'new' star trek movie... but the shittiest film of the whole fanchise was created instead... <br />:(BlauPandanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-41201326802079547452009-12-01T00:41:54.811-05:002009-12-01T00:41:54.811-05:00Are you serious? The new Star Trek was awesome. I ...Are you serious? The new Star Trek was awesome. I agree, the whole time travel thing had a few holes but it was easy enough for anyone to understand. People really shouldn't be questioning Star Trek's theory of time travel too much it because it's a sci-fi movie. Also Chris Pine was great as Kirk, it was really cool to a badass Kirk who was funny and who got his ass kicked in several scenes in the movie because it was something very different and unexpected. The fact that the movie had a much faster paste allowed a much wider audience to get into the movie. Also the special effects were really great and the sounds of the enterprise were classic. Star Trek was an exciting, entertaining and amazing film and I loved it. Btw all you Trekkies have to stop picking on it because it has a very little amount small "unrealistic" details because the whole Star Trek series itself is very unrealistic.Reisen Inabahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05972049541171544430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-18586996723238493472009-11-28T19:46:37.441-05:002009-11-28T19:46:37.441-05:00ps. sorry for the typos, I was busy throwing away ...ps. sorry for the typos, I was busy throwing away the movie and looking at it in the garbage as I wrote. I was thinking of the money I wasted too.<br /><br />Above all else, I feel bad for Gene. The director should have just gone and pissed on Gene's grave if he had that much of a beef with Gene's vision.<br /><br />And, what a sad thing it must be for the family of Gene to have to watch... his creation and his prodigal vision, turned 180 degrees into this abomination.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-86707078406219092942009-11-28T18:49:47.994-05:002009-11-28T18:49:47.994-05:00The rip off: I was expecting to learn more about h...The rip off: I was expecting to learn more about how the original crew came to be. Glimpses of depth into how each trained and earned a position, rank, and station on a FLAGSHIP, in the context of a contemporary storyline. That WAS the selling angle that they baited us with. Yay for them, they fooled us and got our money.<br /><br />People new to Star Trek: If you liked this film, good for you. It wasn't Star Trek though. You all remind me of intellectually challenged, roid raged, visually addicted persons who are trying to tell old veterans of war what war is all about, yet you've never even been to war. One word... OBLIVIOUS.<br /><br />I feel sad: Gene's vision. A precious thing, STILL beyond the comprehension of the masses, and evidently EVEN MORESO. Star Trek in the form of television, movies, comics, and cartoons; these were only mediums for Gene's VISION. The mediums are what they are, but the vision has been mostly intact, until now. Again, Gene's vision... R.I.P.<br /><br />The director: Passionate yes... as a fly trying to get outside by continually bumping into a window. He's clueless in every sense of the word when it come's to understanding "the vision" that Gene had. The director understands the nature of Gene's vision about as much as a fly understands the nature of glass.<br /><br />Physics: Subjectively speaking, there was more alignment to known physics in the original series than there was in this latest POS "Star trek". Just the falls, inertia, impacts of the bodies, and so on. "Kirk's" jumps and subsequent impacts on the "drill" and inside the "mining vessel" would have likely killed any human being alive, if not instantly, then soon afterwards by internal bleeding, or any number of other causes associated with blunt force traumas of that nature. I guess he's Superman in addition to the greatest genious of all time. And! he can change his gentics at will (remember those beautiful blue eyes) lol<br /><br />In summary: Star Trek was an extension of Gene's mind and vision. His vision was well beyond its time. THIS is what true Star Trek fans embrace. Traces of his insights can be seen anew in re-watching the original series over and over, IF yu have the mind to see it. Sadly, it would seem that contemporary human minds lack the ability to see his vision. We live in a world of stupidville, and we are vastly outnumbered. It seems as though there are only a few who understand what Gene was trying to do. At least there is some hope, as his vision, in as much as we can see it, still resides in those of us who actually got the point of what he was trying to do. Simply put: If you liked this movie you:<br /><br />a) understand Gene's vision, decided to ignore it, and let yourself enjoy the visuals.<br /><br />b) don't understood Gene's vision and don't really care about it.<br /><br />c)have little to no grasp of science (particularly physics) as we currently know it, and are willing to accept concepts and ideas that go far beyond science fiction, and into the realm of sheer idiocy.<br /><br />d) just enjoy seeing interesting looking things move about without any rhyme or reason. <br /><br />e)insert your own ideas here (lol)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-47835229162997686162009-11-28T18:49:47.993-05:002009-11-28T18:49:47.993-05:00Like so many have said... even with the new timeli...Like so many have said... even with the new timeline angle, there was enough unaltered timeline material that remained, and STILL didn't correspond to unaltered timeline canon, or even simple logic. (The fat guy on the Space channel is a moron, this movie was the opposite of Star Trek canon).<br /><br />Genetics: Kirk has blue eyes now? Chekov is blond? Sulu is now not Japanese? Ohura's genetics are from what part of Africa now? and so on, and so on... *sigh*<br /><br />Military hierachy: Give me a break... a cadet given command of the flagship in any fleet, based on herioc actions? Based on a field commission?? Based on being a genious??? How can anyone with any brain cells accept that as a possibility given the entire nature of all human based command structures? Did I say "give me a break" sheesh... there are a lot of people out there that exist in la la land.<br /><br />Gene's Dream: Ideas and concepts beyond the comprehension and acceptance of most late 1960's human minds. Then ~10 years later people start seeing the dream, how far ahead it was, and embraced it, and held on to it for ~40 years. Now we are back to farmville, where evidently the majority of human minds are in a pre-1970's state, enamoured with flashing lights to the point that their brains don't work correctly."Star Trek"... a Dream dead...a vision destroyed, Gene probably turning in his grave, and people are absolutely raving about this POS movie. There was better acting in Zoolander, and reading the positive reviews about this movie makes me "feel like I'm taking crazy pills". R.I.P. - Star Trek the vision of a better future.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-6556774245795238602009-11-18T00:42:46.143-05:002009-11-18T00:42:46.143-05:00i liked the new star trek movie, reviving a dwindl...i liked the new star trek movie, reviving a dwindling franchise can only be a good thing, i have been a star trek fan all my life and i find it refreshing that they have re-worked it so that it can go on for years to come, i do think that they have detracted from its values somewhat but nothing stays the same forever, i think it is a good move to take it in a new direction, maybe to alleiviate your worries we can call the original format "timeline 1" and the new film "timeline 2" then we haven't lost anything, we just have two versions, great star trek fun for all! just because they have done something new doesn't mean they can't go back. also, the holes in the plot theories, doesn't the fact that a ship is travelling faster than light tell you something, black holes dont let you travel through time so what, "its a story" you cant accept one thing and moan about another its not all about "you". dont get me wrong, i love the old trek but this opens up a lot more possibility for the story i love, hear's to star trek!martsxxxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08851039133735586782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-5800027534597886272009-10-28T14:37:23.234-04:002009-10-28T14:37:23.234-04:00ok the last post I wrote might have been a little ...ok the last post I wrote might have been a little means. :)<br />someone compared this to the recent series of comics book reboots and that put it all into perspective.<br />Why?<br />I hate all the comics reboots except batman (begins and the dark knight) and spider-man was "watchable". And I realized the reason I hate those reboots may be the same reason you hate this star trek movie. <br />Because I know the series and I already have an idea of what it "should" be, and then them movies didn't live up to that I was thoroughly disappointed. <br />The biggest one to me had to be the X-men series. The first one was true enough to the series of the comics book but they went so far as to change the ages of certain characters for the sake of plot.<br />For those of you saw the movie did you know what rogue is actually the same age and Gene, Scott, and wolverine? Why is she a teenager in the film?<br />This pissed me off but for someone who never heard of X-men I'm sure this didn't phase them one bit and my complaining about rogue being changed to such a degree would be seen as nitpicking to those people.<br />So, with this new perspective I say, you have every right not to like this film. <br />But please respect the fact that I (and bunch of other people) do. Stop insulting us. Thank you.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11092781069572917681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-80309502159280354352009-10-28T14:23:02.636-04:002009-10-28T14:23:02.636-04:00I have a lot to say, but this says it all for me. ...I have a lot to say, but this says it all for me. :)<br /><br />http://www.theonion.com/content/video/trekkies_bash_new_star_trek_filmAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11092781069572917681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-45927789732540841732009-07-08T22:21:36.706-04:002009-07-08T22:21:36.706-04:00I agree fully that this movie sucked big time. I t...I agree fully that this movie sucked big time. I thought it couldn't get any worse after Nemisis, but hey, my expectations were clearly too high. <br />I think whatever else sucked about the movie, your point about Roddenberry's philosophy about humanity and the future and how this movie ignored or countered it is what makes this such an insulting film. Star Trek VIII was the fullest fruition of this vision in a film, and while ST IX was really just a long expensive episode, still held true to the moral ideal. ST X was ammoral, this was immoral.Elliott Encarnaciónhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14436838523558503674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-42679618368539130152009-06-24T13:20:36.049-04:002009-06-24T13:20:36.049-04:00How about we put together a class action suit for ...How about we put together a class action suit for everybody who felt ripped off? Even if we lose, Hollywood would think twice about messing with us this way again. To me, this was out and out fraud. They called it Star Trek for the sole purpose of duping us out of our money - they freaking lied through their teeth. Instead of Star Trek (ST) they should have called it Star Hole in Time (I leave the Acronym to the reader).<br /><br />I disagree mildly with some previous posters on one point: The time travel thing wasn't about fixing plot errors. No. It was about creating a license to do whatever the hell they felt like. Abrams probably wanted complete liberty so that no script could be wrong - he wanted to "comic-book" the TOS series. He wanted Kirk to be a dark character because dark characters sell. BUT, unlike Batman, Spiderman, The Incredible Hulk, or Iron Man, STAR TREK WAS NOT ORIGINALLY DEFINED A F-ing COMIC BOOK! IT WAS DEFINED, EXCLUSIVELY AND EXPLICITLY, BY THE TV SERIES. NO SUCH LICENSE TO MESS WITH IT CAN EXIST IN THE SAME WAY.<br /><br />Abrams could get away with reinventions of other fictional universes so long as he was somewhat faithful to the comic book. But here, even if he did read some ST comics, he still wasn't at all faithful to the the characters.<br /><br />On the one hand, they avoided character development because we were already supposed to know these guys - they capitalized on the names Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Scott, Uhura, Checkov, Sulu, Pike, etc. But on the other hand, they put us on notice (only after the movie is about a quarter over) that "no, don't presume to know these characters - they are totally different now." It's like saying, yes, this is James T Kirk, but not the James T Kirk you know, nor does he exist now because we erased him from the timeline.<br /><br />WTF???<br />WTF???<br />WTF???<br /><br /><br />So, if it's not the Kirk that I know, then why would I want to see the movie? If they had clued me in with reasonable notice, I WOULDN'T have seen the movie.<br /><br />So basically, an implied warranty existed that the movie, as a prequel, would develop young characters into characters with which we have already become familiar, or at least move them in that direction. They knew full well that we would go to see the movie based solely on that representation, and nothing else. They lied. They played it very close to the chest that Kirk would not be Kirk, Spock would not be Spock (even the old Spock played by Nemoy was not Spock - WTF???). They also went out of their way to foil our effort to exercise diligence before being duped.<br /><br />If 1000 fans demand their money back, and issue press releases... This will get some attention for sure. Maybe we can scare those arrogant b*****ds into never trying a stunt like this again. As another poster put it, it's like it was all a dream... the last time someone tried that, it killed a TV series.<br /><br />I say sue. All we have to lose are the filing fees. If 1000 of us pitch in, that will work out to about 25 cents each.<br /><br /><br />-- Almost non-trekkie who STILL knows enough to know that this was crap, and we have not only been disappointed, we have been RIPPED OFF. Cursed be those who call themselves Star Trek, and are not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-78241866855747877182009-06-17T20:30:25.005-04:002009-06-17T20:30:25.005-04:00It was really cool to see Kirk get his butt handed...It was really cool to see Kirk get his butt handed to him multiple times. Less cool to see Spock get more lady action than Kirk. And really lame to see the entire Star Trek universe changed from the stardate of Kirk onward.<br /><br />"Lame!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-67187221056413974602009-06-15T17:03:16.178-04:002009-06-15T17:03:16.178-04:00I was relieved to discover I'm not the only on...<a href="http://tr.im/oApF" rel="nofollow">I was relieved to discover I'm not the only one who was disappointed by the new Star Trek movie</a>! I'm not a Trekkie, but I still enjoyed the franchise immensely. But now all those stories and characters for which we spent years growing appreciation have been wiped clean.<br /><br />What a slap in the face that true fans of the original Stark Trek universe and time line were completely abandoned for this "new generation" in a universe that flies in the face that everything Roddenberry envisioned...SelAromhttp://www.selarom.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-36796958885958779582009-06-10T13:24:35.048-04:002009-06-10T13:24:35.048-04:00P/S It's spelt Roddenberry...P/S It's spelt Roddenberry...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-65426161378000622592009-06-09T04:37:44.729-04:002009-06-09T04:37:44.729-04:00There are so many inconsistencies I lost track. Wh...There are so many inconsistencies I lost track. When did Uhura have a relationship with Spock? Did I miss that original episode? Maybe you missed the part where time-travel makes things different. It wasn't *just* a plot gimmick to introduce the bad guy. Kirk wasn't the first captain of the Enterprise in this world. Scotty was stuck on a base in the ass-end of nowhere. Spock and Uhura were lovers. Yup, things changed.<br />Pike was the first Captain in the origional series and Spock was his first officer.... just like in this movie. <br />Time travel makes things different up to a point. Bones joined as a cadet around the same time he did in the origional series proof of this is where he gives the speech about bones, his nick name he has nothing left now so he joined Star Fleet. Kirk joined the same time. Kirk went though the star ship test that spock made and altered it like in the origional. If I recall correctly Pike was the first Captain. Uhura and Spock fell in love because sexy things make movies sell. Spock's character is supposed to show almost no emotions, even in the origional Star Trek he resists the advances of the nurse in sick bay even though he likes her alot. Yet in this movie he's ga ga over Uhura. The time line did not change that much to make Spock into a human, he still had ears shaped like a Vulcan.<br /><br />What the heck was up with Chekov? He was the only one able to work the transporter? The only one able to wield enough skill to grab two guys falling through atmosphere at terminal velocity, yes.<br />I'd be willing to believe that that's not part of your standard Starfleet transporter training. Chekov's just apparently got the skillz.<br /><br />When you look at the screen he was manually trying to line up boxes with the people like an arcade game. This was done for some drama. It's only computer Tracking technology that is needed as the people were on the screen and detected just not locked on to. Technology to lock onto a variable (all 1's and 0's) exists today and even in the 1980's on the Atari 2600. It's used all the time. A pocket calculator could probley do it. They just wanted to make it seem full of action and was aimed at people who don't think.<br /><br />Even if they built an automated system star ship and forgot to add 2 lines of code for tracking in a transporter, it's safe to assume that there was at least a class or lecture on moving targets and practice in simulators as it's bound to happen, after all it happened constantly in this movie. The ship holds a few hundred people all very intelligent including transporter chief's who are trained above and beyond normal people, it's their trade. Which raises the question, why would a cadet who has limited experience on systems out perform senior officers who have worked on those types of systems for years.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-61883510503608040222009-06-09T03:57:23.777-04:002009-06-09T03:57:23.777-04:00This movie is not good, it has no story line, just...This movie is not good, it has no story line, just special effects and loud noise. Special effects and loud noise don't make a great movie, a great story line makes it.<br /><br />Anyone who likes this movie is easily impressed and does not know anything about Star Trek. If they like this movie but don't like Star Trek enough to watch the older movies and understand the history and facts which make Star Trek amazing then why start watching now.<br /><br />I'm throwing my Star Trek DVD's in the garbage and will never have anything to do with Star Trek again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-27845709811202372182009-06-09T03:34:31.433-04:002009-06-09T03:34:31.433-04:00Yes time travel is what people do when they can...Yes time travel is what people do when they can't come up with any ideas that are good. <br /><br />Because of this movie i'm not longer a star trek fan sold all movies i'm out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-89962552550911343952009-06-09T03:32:51.076-04:002009-06-09T03:32:51.076-04:00Yes this movie was really bad. They destroyed the ...Yes this movie was really bad. They destroyed the future time period of the Star Trek series. The Voyage home never happened because Vulcan is not there, there are a million things in history it changes like in DS9, Voyager etc.<br /><br />Kirk and the rest of the cadets get promoted and that usually takes years, thats not right, it seems the cast did not earn it though hard work.<br /><br />The transporter technology has no range and can go anywhere, so technically no ships are needed including cargo ships. Voyager might not even happen because the future was altered but if it does they can just transport home. In DS9 the wormhole will be meaningless because they can already transport accross the universe.<br /><br />And the most important part.....<br /><br />People think this is an alternate reality or some other universe but......<br /><br />When they went in the black hole it was considered time travel. If it were a parallel reality or other deminsion then nero would not have hunted down Spock or destroyed Valcun in this new parallel reality because the origional reality would not be altered or changed. Why would he waste his time accomplishing nothing?<br /><br />If it were a parallel reality Nero would have spent his time trying to get back to the origional reality because then he could actually do something that would matter.<br /><br />Spock just meant that the time line has changed and now their reality is the true reality. This means all Star Trek has been erased and staring new.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-51185145553187257052009-06-04T12:25:46.505-04:002009-06-04T12:25:46.505-04:00I just had to type "Star Trek sucked" in...I just had to type "Star Trek sucked" into Google because apparently no one else wants to hear it!<br /><br />Thanks for the measured, right-on post!<br /><br />/vUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11849573884640585151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-22987442420622754812009-05-29T09:52:51.342-04:002009-05-29T09:52:51.342-04:00The "alternate universe" crap was a total cop out....The "alternate universe" crap was a total cop out. The plot holes were ENORMOUS, and the whole film was crap!<br />J.J. Abrams needs to stick to TV and leave film making to the BIG BOYS!<br />I've been a "Star Trek" fan since September 8th, 1966, but this steaming pile of poop has totally alienated me from the franchise.Actionguyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12301891607818502271noreply@blogger.com