tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post794282194972892429..comments2024-01-16T05:48:33.523-05:00Comments on Errata Security: Dear Obama, From InfosecDavid Maynorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09921229607193067441noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-21779372782128649512020-11-06T08:21:13.296-05:002020-11-06T08:21:13.296-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02809983068718503805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-70103672787695997172017-01-12T06:08:05.430-05:002017-01-12T06:08:05.430-05:00"Even if these hackers weren't under the ..."Even if these hackers weren't under the direct command of Putin, we know he could put a stop to such hacking if he chose"<br />You are suggesting that: <br />A: Putin was well informed about the hacks from within "Russia" (as if location is relevant these days) before and during these hacks.<br />B: Putin was able to put a stop to those hackers.<br />C: Putin cared a rodents bottom.<br /><br />Do you think a president has the knowledge and power to predict, monitor, and prevent anyone from hacking a system outside his country? Substitute Putin/Obama and Russia/USA and read that line back. Does it stil make as much sense?dramklukkelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688885714285663025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-31870756133033766692017-01-09T16:37:55.992-05:002017-01-09T16:37:55.992-05:00Hogwash! Director of National Intelligence James C...Hogwash! Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said earlier today, "We have evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC and our elections. The most credible<br />hard evidence is the user names that the hackers used. Some examples of these user names are 'RussionBoy', 'GuyFromRussia', 'RedRussianBear', 'MoscowManny',<br />'VodkaVinny', 'GeneralBorshevsky', and 'LOLFAG'." If that isn't evidence, I don't know what is! :-PAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-50803136529580452122017-01-07T03:52:19.281-05:002017-01-07T03:52:19.281-05:00Guys, why are you even snap at each other? You and...Guys, why are you even snap at each other? You and President are on the same side! You both are "more than willing to believe" that "ЯUSSIANS АЯЕ СOMING!" Does it matter THAT much that you need a pretty ritual around your delusions and that he is pure believer and only need pastor's word for that?Rowaa[SR13]https://www.blogger.com/profile/00071948759131882045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-24319158896877612792017-01-05T15:23:26.206-05:002017-01-05T15:23:26.206-05:00Respectfully to all viewpoints and affiliations, I...Respectfully to all viewpoints and affiliations, I'm not sure the op is a 'good conservative' if the 'message' is 'already agreed with' unless Obama is suddenly a conservative...? The op's apparent dismay with these inconvenient truths may reflect a general 'a ha' moment for many reading this post, if not an epiphany for all of those attempting to reconcile an engineer's logic with political platforms. Which platform or message could change, but reason and politics remain relatively constant... and methinks the twain shall rarely meet. testhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17860652309849440251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-83119269913837508212017-01-05T02:42:55.539-05:002017-01-05T02:42:55.539-05:00Question: What does it mean to "irretrievably...Question: What does it mean to "irretrievably" damage a message? What would we want to retrieve that we can no longer retrieve?Joe Duartehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14296929728589283424noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-40382937363340001032017-01-04T10:58:32.646-05:002017-01-04T10:58:32.646-05:00The good conservative get lied to his face times a...The good conservative get lied to his face times and times again, but is still "more than willing to believe".Bamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08794226171388451139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-69298491084305497872017-01-04T08:24:10.970-05:002017-01-04T08:24:10.970-05:00"As it stands now, all you've done is sup..."As it stands now, all you've done is support Trump's narrative, making this look like propaganda -- and bad propaganda at that. Give us, the infosec/cybersec community, technical details we can look at, analyze, and confirm."<br /><br />Perhaps we have all the information we need. <br />testhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17860652309849440251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37798047.post-86509979066128874122017-01-04T07:16:37.512-05:002017-01-04T07:16:37.512-05:00".. How they get from the facts (one person a...".. How they get from the facts (one person accessed Yahoo email) to the story (Russians hacked power grid) is your responsibility. This misinformation is your fault." <br /><br />I don't think the President has as much control over the media as you imagine. There are other more powerful individuals and groups who have a vested interest in making Russia look bad. https://www.rt.com/news/233439-us-meddling-ukraine-crisis/ I know it's from Russia Today, but I remember most of it from when it actually happened via reporting in Europe. I don't know if the US media covered it in the same way - I highly doubt it.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13971103862693010694noreply@blogger.com