IMPOSSIBLE:— General Flynn (@GenFlynn) November 6, 2016
There R 691,200 seconds in 8 days. DIR Comey has thoroughly reviewed 650,000 emails in 8 days? An email / second? IMPOSSIBLE RT
Reading Wiener's own emails, those unrelated to his wife Huma or Hillary, is unlikely to be productive. Therefore, the FBI is going to filter those 650,000 Wiener emails to get at those emails that were also sent to/from Hillary and Huma.
That's easy for automated tools to do. Just search the From: and To: fields for email addresses known to be used by Hillary and associates. For example, search for email@example.com (Hillary's current email address) and firstname.lastname@example.org (Huma Abedin's current email).
Below is an example email header from the Podesta dump:
From: Jennifer Palmieri <email@example.com> Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 11:23:56 -0400 Message-ID: <-8018289478115811964@unknownmsgid> Subject: WJC NBC interview To: H <firstname.lastname@example.org>, John Podesta <email@example.com>, Huma Abedin <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Robby Mook <email@example.com>, Kristina Schake <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This is likely to filter down the emails to a manageable few thousand.
Next, filter the emails for ones already in the FBI's possession. The easiest way is using the Message-ID: header. It's a random value created for every email. If a Weiner email has the same Message-ID as an email already retrieved from Huma and Hillary, then the FBI can ignore it.
This is then like to reduce the number of emails need for review to less than a thousand, or less than 100, or even all the way down to zero. And indeed, that's what NBC news is reporting:
NBC's Pete Williams reports that nearly all of the e-mails found on the Weiner laptop were duplicates of e-mails FBI already reviewed.— Tom Winter (@Tom_Winter) November 6, 2016
The point is is this. Computer geeks have tools that make searching the emails extremely easy. Given those emails, and a list of known email accounts from Hillary and associates, and a list of other search terms, it would take me only a few hours to do reduce the workload from 650,000 emails to only a couple hundred, which a single person can read in less than a day.
The question isn't whether the FBI could review all those emails in 8 days, but why the FBI couldn't have reviewed them all in one or two days. Or even why they couldn't have reviewed them before Comey made that horrendous announcement that they were reviewing the emails.
@SarahClapp @BernardKerik They pictured Comey with a huge printer, reams of paper and a highlighter— Atomic Elbow (@AtomicElbow1) November 6, 2016
When someone needs 30 Seconds to analyse an email and has a normal workday, he/she can have a look at 7680 Emails.
When you are the FBI, i'm guessing it shouldn't be a problem at all to get 85 People working on that topic to analyse them without taking an hour overtime :-)
If you can reduce that many emails, it just gets cheaper.
You said to enter their new emails addresses to and fro? What about her previous or any other alias type emails addresses? Everyone knows that she broke the law that's not the question, the question is why isn't she being held accountable for it?
Thanks for providing a clear explanation for this. I think that it should be obvious to most people that a logical and methodical process combined with some pretty basic technology would make this a trivial problem to solve. BUT, it is good to see it spelled out. Thanks!!!
Well, It's impossible if It's just not one person reviewing them, if a 100 people do it, then its surely possible.
Explain to me how the FBI can review 650,000 emails in 8 days to come to the conclusion they did whereas IT TOOK OVER A YEAR FOR THE STATE DEPT TO RELEASE 55,000?? ARE YOU KIDDING ME??
You sir are a liar. While it is true that computers can scan through huge amounts of data in a short amount of time, they cannot understand intent or context. A HUMAN must deal with that.
Here is a hypothetical phrase. One person says to another, "I see the truck now".
The other says "I need a tow".
Most people would assume that his car is broken down. But way, these two in my hypothetical example are in norther Iraq, and they are planning to blow up a specific truck. The "tow" I mentioned is a US provided tow missile, and these are terrorists planning on destroying a truck. I am calling you out.
Clearly you didn't understand anything he explained, then. He explained how the FBI, or really anyone with some halfway decent skills, can find the group of relative emails, those sent to or from Hillary Clinton and her staff, then they filter the messages for duplicates against what is already in their possession that they have already read. Those emails get ruled out. Nobody needs to read them again. Then, they're left with a manageable amount of relevant emails that human beings can read. Not that difficult to do or understand.
To artifactsofmars: You're 100% wrong; what, do you think compilers which rely on context are full of it? They aren't. Even besides that there is this little other issue: if there aren't many emails it's easy to go through; just because you can't read sufficiently doesn't mean everyone can't. Furthermore, it was as I recall reported the FBI put a lot of effort into the matter exactly because of the election.
dangermoose: Same as to 'artifacts'. It's called priorities. Pretty elementary stuff here. Or is this the American problem getting you? It's that isn't it?
They don't care about context if the 650,000 emails are outside of the scope of their investigation (between Wiener and anybody, EVERYBODY who isn't HRC) or duplicates of what they already have. They use the computer programs to filter out what they don't need. If you just want to snipe hunt though, I've got a time portal to 1950 where you can hunt all the subversives you want with Uncle Joe McCarthy.
Didn't Huma swear she had turned over all devices with state dept info on them? How is this not a crime?
"Newsweek also notes that Weiner told investigators that he had synced Abedin's phone to his laptop for backup purposes."
She likely did not know he was doing this
I wake up everyday with a smile on my face and singing praises to this powerful spell caster called Dr,Okaya who has done me a great favor by rescuing my relationship from break up. I used to think that i have a perfect relationship till when my lover started coming home late and everyday he gives me different excuses then i decided to keep a close eye on him then i discovers that he was having an affair with another Woman, I was heart broken because i trusted him so much and knowing that he has a secret relationship, hurts me a lot.. But i thank all those who placed the contact information of Dr,Okaya on the internet because through that i have been able to contact Dr, and today my relationship has been restored with love and more Respect than ever before. If you are in any kind of relationship or marriage stress i will do you a favor by dropping the contact information's of Dr,Okaya which are via email: OKAYASPELLHELP@GMAIL.COM ... OR call Him on his number +270814506790
Post a Comment