Tuesday, February 02, 2010
Kindle DX vs. the iPad
The new device came labeled "Robert's 6th Kindle". My first two Kindle's were versions 1 and 2 of the device, the other three are the software readers on my iPhone, notebook, and desktop. Presumably, once I get the iPad in two months, that will be my 7th Kindle tracked by Amazon.
The fact that I have some many Kindles reinforces the fact that it's a "cloud book library" and not a device. I have 168 items in my library. Many have described the Apple iPad as a competitor to the Kindle, but the opposite is true: Amazon is in the business of selling books, it'll happily sell you a book for your iPad, and store it in your cloud library.
I bring up the iPad because it's roughly the same size as the Kindle DX. It has roughly the same physical dimensions, although the iPad is about 40% heavier. The Kindle's screen is 1200x800, while the iPad is 1024x768.
The devices have different trade-offs. The Kindles use "e-ink" technology that requires no power to maintain its state. Thus, the device wakes up to redraw the page, then goes back to sleep while you read it. This means it has fantastic battery life, going for a week between charges even under heavy use. The iPad, though, will only go 10 hours between charges. Because of the battery life, I'd rather travel with my Kindle than an iPad.
The e-ink has problems. It doesn't support color, and is a dark-grey on light-grey text. This makes it hard to read in low-light conditions, although it's easy to read in bright sunlight. The iPad is a normal LCD display, which is easy to read in low-light, but harder to read in bright light. However, whereas many laptops are nearly impossible to read in direct sunlight, the iPad should still be legible. That's because it uses the same IPS LCD technology found on the iPhone and MacBooks.
Another trade-off is screen refresh. It takes about a half-second for the Kindle device to update the screen. This makes navigating the device painfully slow. It's a minor tradeoff when reading books from start to finish, but is painful when navigating a college textbooks. And, of course, the Kindle lacks touch screen, which makes navigation even worse. Amazon created the Kindle DX for colleges, but in my experience, it sucks. The iPad will be much better.
Another problem is PDFs. I plugged the Kindle into my computers, where it appeared as an external drive. I dragged-n-dropped some PDFs over to the Kindle to read them. Some worked fine, but others didn't. The problem is that the DX forces a PDF to be scaled at 100%, one page per screen. You can't zoom in or out. In some cases, the font was too small to be legible, and there's just no fixing that. The iPad handles PDFs much better.
Humorously, the first thing I read on the Kindle DX was the latest The Economist magazine that has picture on it's cover showing Jobs' new iPad. Reading magazines on the larger Kindle is much easier, due to the difficulty of reading images.
The DX is my new primary device for reading books and magazines. I read roughly 2 magazines a week and one book every two weeks, so that's quite a bit of time I'll be spending with the device. However, in two months, that might change again when I get the iPad, and read Kindle books from that device instead.
By the way, I think the iPad will be about as successful as the Mac Mini: not a failure, but not a runaway success either. I believe the keyboard is just too important to give up, and that there will never be a replacement (not voice recognition, not touchscreens, not anything). On airplanes, I see a lot of laptop computers and Kindles, I doubt I'll be seeing tablet computers (the iPad or the coming crop of competitors) displacing the laptop.